Advaita Vedānta
The deepest self is not other than Brahman. Liberation is knowledge of an identity that was never actually absent.
Sixty seconds
A plain-language answer that keeps the traditions distinct instead of blending them into one. Six structures, each with the entry that evidences it.
Six structures, side by side. This page is the short definitional answer — it says what the traditions each mean and how they differ. The historical development of those differences is on the guided history; what they sound like from inside is in their own words.
↩ Back to the AtlasOrdinary experience seems to divide reality into me in here and the world out there. Nondual traditions ask whether that division is final. Their answers are not the same.
The deepest self is not other than Brahman. Liberation is knowledge of an identity that was never actually absent.
The error is not failing to discover one hidden substance, but treating self and phenomena as possessing independent own-being.
Awakening is described through recognition of an already-present empty-luminous knowing rather than fabrication of a new state.
Consciousness recognizes itself as Śiva and manifestation as its own expression. This is affirmative where Madhyamaka is deliberately non-substantialist.
Some traditions dissolve separation without simply erasing relation: lover and Beloved, nām and the one reality, annihilation and abiding.
Other traditions destabilize fixed distinctions or begin from relation itself, without asserting that all multiplicity reduces to one metaphysical substance.
The evidence behind this page
Every claim above opens into the atlas, and the atlas is loaded here — the same timeline, the same map, the same entries. Open it in place, or go to the Atlas itself.